Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hart v. Centurion Medical Provider, et al.
as 3:2023cv03001
Plaintiff:
Eugene Hart
Defendant:
Centurron Medical Providers, Dr. Jane Doe, Nurse Jane Doe and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saquing v. Mallett et al
as 3:2020cv00182
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Ronald Ellzy Woodall, Wexler Medical and others
Plaintiff:
John Milton Saquing
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hart v. Rush Foundation Hospital et al
as 3:2019cv00787
Plaintiff:
Eugene Hart
Defendant:
Rush Foundation Hospital, MTC and Centurion Medical Services Providers
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deyarmett v. The Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00088
Defendant:
Centurion Medical Providers of Mississippi, LLC, The Mississippi Department of Corrections, Merit Health Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Wayne Deyarmett
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. King et al
as 3:2017cv00900
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis
Defendant:
Ron King, Unknown Male Bus Driver and Centurion (Medical Provider)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gunn v. MTC-EMCF et al
as 3:2017cv00815
Plaintiff:
LaBoris O. Gunn
Defendant:
MTC-EMCF, Centurion Medical, P. Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGee v. Centurion Medical Services et al
as 1:2017cv00224
Plaintiff:
Charles L. McGee
Defendant:
Centurion Medical Services, Aramark Food Services Corp., John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Voyles v. Abangan et al
as 3:2016cv00115
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Voyles
Defendant:
Unknown Abangan, Unknown Rice, Centurion Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darnell v. Jimenez et al
as 1:2016cv00030
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lee Darnell
Defendant:
Uknown Jimenez, Unknown Hardy, Unknown Woodall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
