Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Ponmankal-Chacko v. Kann et al
as 1:2024cv03329
Plaintiff:
Sajan Ponmankal-Chacko
Defendant:
Matthew Kann and Rantz Trucking Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 md Diversity-Motor Vehicle/Wrongful Death
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Chacko v. Office of the New York State Comptroller et al
as 1:2020cv10697
Plaintiff:
Chacko Ruby, CEO Thomas P. Dinapoli and Ruby Chacko
Defendant:
Office of the New York State Comptroller and Thomas P. Dinapoli
Beckwith et al v. New York City Transit Authority
as 1:2019cv10930
Plaintiff:
Patricia Tarrant, Audrey Charles, Wei Zhao and others
Defendant:
The New York City Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Chacko v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
as 1:2019cv08051
Defendant:
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
VIJU CHACKO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr
Amalfitano v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv09100
Plaintiff:
Vito Amalfitano
Defendant:
Eric Dym, Tony Chacko, Sean Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Westchester County Independence Party v. Astorino
as 7:2013cv07737
Plaintiff:
The Westchester County Independence Party , Richard Rhoades , Irma Y. Drace and others
Defendant:
Robert P. Astorino, Robert A. Astorino, Douglas A. Colety and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03996
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Parks v. USA et al
as 3:2009cv01162
Plaintiff:
William A. Parks
Defendant:
USA, Barack Obama, Social Security Admin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
