Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Regions Bank v. C.E.G. Companies, LLC
as 4:2023cv01162
Plaintiff:
Regions Bank, C.E.G Companies, LLC and Chad Andrew Duchsherer
Defendant:
C.E.G. Companies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19165
Plaintiff:
CHAD ANDREW DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ANDREWS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv55750
Plaintiff:
CHAD ANDREWS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lute v Martin
as 5:2021cv00354
Respondent:
Jimmy Martin
Petitioner:
Chad Andrew Lute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hart v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01182
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Chad Andrew Hart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lute v Martin
as 4:2021cv00090
Respondent:
Jimmy Martin
Petitioner:
Chad Andrew Lute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Andrew v. Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Company, The
as 1:2020cv00179
Plaintiff:
John Chad Andrew
Defendant:
Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Company, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
John Smith v. Sandra Aldridge, et al
as 20-35999
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL D. WEISSER, in their entire personal and professional capacities, ANTHONY GOLIK, in their entire personal and professional capacities, SANDRA ALDRIDGE, in their entire personal and professional capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN GARRETT SMITH
OSINGA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv92973
Plaintiff:
CHAD ANDREW OSINGA
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chad Larsen v. USCA9, et al
as 20-16664
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, BYBEE, TASHIMA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHAD ANDREW LARSEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
