Cases 1 - 9 of 9
CHANDLER et al v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
as 2:2022cv06241
Plaintiff:
ALEX CHANDLER and SELEDIA SERINA
Defendant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
CHANDLER et al v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
as 1:2022cv06241
Plaintiff:
ALEX CHANDLER and SELEDIA SERINA
Defendant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Acosta et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00850
Plaintiff:
Sharon Acosta, Baron Allen, Andrew Anderer and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00847
Plaintiff:
Christina Adams, Peter Eldridge, Jonathan Fessenden and others
Defendant:
Michael Brewer and Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Abner et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00810
Plaintiff:
Carl Abner, Donna Adair, Jason Adams and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Ables et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00758
Plaintiff:
Steven Ables, Steven Aguado, Jonathan Alexander and others
Defendant:
Zechariah Adams and Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00762
Plaintiff:
Sarrah Adams, Levi Allen, Kimberly Alverson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
CHANDLER et al v. E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND CO.
as 2:2012cv04220
Plaintiff:
COLETTE CHANDLER and FRANK FRIEDMAN
Defendant:
E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHANDLER v. SUZUKI OF PLYMOUTH MEETING et al
as 2:2011cv01038
Plaintiff:
TANYA CHANDLER
Defendant:
SUZUKI OF PLYMOUTH MEETING, NICK MORALES, SANTANDER CONSUMER USA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
