Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 74
Christopher Chandler v. Donald Berlin, et al
as 20-7102
Defendant / Appellant: Investigative Consultants, Inc., Investigative Consultants, Inc. of Washington, DC and Donald Berlin
Plaintiff / Appellee: Christopher Chandler
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CHANDLER
as 1:2020cv00907
Defendant: RICHARD CHANDLER
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Christopher Chandler v. Donald Berlin, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-7020
Defendant / Appellee: Investigative Consultants, Inc., Investigative Consultants, Inc. of Washington, DC and Donald Berlin
Plaintiff / Appellant: Christopher Chandler
USA v. Dontaye Chandler
as 19-3041
Defendant / Appellant: Dontaye Chandler
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
ANTELOPE VALLEY HOSPITAL et al v. AZAR, II
as 1:2019cv00328
Plaintiff: ST. MARY MEDICAL CENTER, COUNTY OF MONTEREY, CENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION FOR HEALTH and others
Defendant: ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
ALAMEDA COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER et al v. AZAR, II
as 1:2018cv02967
Plaintiff: CONTRA COSTA HEALTH SERVICES, COUNTY OF MONTEREY, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA and others
Defendant: ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
HOBBY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2018cv02873
Defendant: EUGENE KINLOW, VENTRIS GIBSON, ALANA INTERIM and others
Plaintiff: GERALDINE TALLEY HOBBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHANDLER v. BERLIN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv02136
Defendant: INVESTIGATIVE CONSULTANTS INCORPORATED, INVESTIGATIVE CONSULTANTS, INC., DONALD MARSHALL BERLIN and others
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER CHANDLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOODERTS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv01646
Defendant: CINDY EPLEY, CHANDLER, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff: LEVI WOODERTS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?