Cases 31 - 40 of 411
Chandler v. Montes et al
as 1:2021cv00410
Defendant:
Cindy A. Montes, Corpus Christi Parole Office, Wichita County Parole Division and others
Plaintiff:
Pete Edward Chandler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carrell v. Collierville385Motors, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00016
Defendant:
John Wayne Chandler, Collierville Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram and Collierville385Motors, LLC
Plaintiff:
Betty Carrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chandler v. Saul
as 4:2020cv04269
Plaintiff:
Madeline L Chandler and Madeline L Aycock Chandler
Defendant:
Commissioner Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Chandler v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv01190
Defendant:
Cook Medical LLC, Cook Incorporated, William Cook Europe ApS and others
Plaintiff:
George Aaron Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
Chandler v. Porschia et al
as 3:2020cv03079
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Malvina Porschia, NFN Elliot and others
Plaintiff:
Idris-Jakari Chandler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waldrup v. Henderson et al
as 4:2020cv03451
Defendant:
Inger Chandler, Patty Maginnis, Paul Damico and others
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Lee Waldrup
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv03060
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Alston v. Woden Independent School District et al
as 9:2020cv00153
Defendant:
Richard Warren Cratty, Jr., Woden Independent School District, Brent Edward Hawkins and others
Plaintiff:
Jacklyn Hancock Alston
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Chandler v. Commissioner, SSA
as 4:2020cv00517
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Sharon Chandler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Grace Instrument Industries, LLC v. Chandler Instruments Company, LLC et al
as 4:2020cv01749
Plaintiff:
Grace Instrument Industries, LLC
Defendant:
Ametek, Inc. and Chandler Instruments Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
