Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Shelnutt v. McLaughlin et al
as 5:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Keneth Kaylon Shelnutt
Defendant:
Josh McLaughlin, Brady Aderholt, Gray West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Obechang et al
as 5:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Jon Lenoska Johnson
Defendant:
Kristin Obechang, Chandler Caldwell, William Streeter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. Brandon et al
as 5:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
Leavert Kendrell McKinney
Defendant:
Jordan D Brandon, John R Chandler and Stephen Langford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays v. Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Otis Mays
Defendant:
Johnson, Moreno, Heckman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oryang v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00023
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Billy Mitchum, Dr. Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Bedogwar Oryang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stegall v. Puckett et al
as 5:2020cv01541
Defendant:
Sgt Aaron Dawson, Chandler, McDuffy and others
Plaintiff:
Herman Isacc Stegall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harmon v. Howell et al
as 7:2019cv01391
Defendant:
Pastor Chris Hodges, Sgt. Brown, Sheriff Denis Green and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Claude Harmon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Estes et al
as 5:2019cv00711
Respondent:
Dewayne Estes and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Petitioner:
Devonte Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Elliott v. Valeska et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2019cv00235
Defendant:
Douglas A. Valeska, Bill Rafferty, Jackie Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Gene Chandler Elliott, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Meeks et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00708
Plaintiff:
David K. Chandler
Defendant:
Dennis Meeks and Covington County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
