Cases 71 - 80 of 129
CHANDLER v. PRINE
as 7:2015cv00128
Petitioner:
CAMERON CHANDLER
Respondent:
CHRIS PRINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chandler v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
as 1:2015cv02289
Plaintiff:
Tara Chandler
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chandler v. Taylor
as 1:2015cv00294
Petitioner:
James D. Chandler
Respondent:
Cedric Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Chandler v. Taylor
as 1:2015cv00295
Petitioner:
James D. Chandler
Respondent:
Cedric Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Orr v. Jackson County Jail et al
as 2:2014cv00247
Plaintiff:
Maurice Chandler Orr, Jr.
Defendant:
Jackson County Jail, Janice Magnum, Jim Askey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Administration for Children Services et al
as 1:2014cv03383
Plaintiff:
Chanel Walker
Defendant:
Administration for Children Services, Claudette Hall, Cassandra Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Orr v. Magnum et al
as 2:2014cv00244
Plaintiff:
Maurice Chandler Orr, Jr.
Defendant:
Janice Magnum, Jim Askey, Mandy Tolan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02978
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Connolly et al v. Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00152
Plaintiff:
Maureen A. Connolly , Sharon Mooney and Lisa Chandler
Defendant:
Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Inc., Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PENNSYLVANIA MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION INSURANCE COMPANY v. MEDICAL MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS LLC et al
as 5:2014cv00189
Plaintiff:
PENNSYLVANIA MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
MEDICAL MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS LLC, GREYSTOKE HEALTH SYSTEMS LIMITED, CHANDLER HEALTH AND REHAB CENTER LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
