Cases 11 - 20 of 110
YANG v. DURRANT et al
as 2:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
IN CHUL YANG
Defendant:
CAMERON DURRANT, TIMOTHY MORRIS, RAINER BOEHM and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
GREENBAUM v. HUMANIGEN, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv06118
Plaintiff:
SCOTT GREENBAUM
Defendant:
HUMANIGEN, INC., TIMOTHY MORRIS, CAMERON DURRANT and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
GREENBAUM v. HUMANIGEN, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv06117
Plaintiff:
SCOTT GREENBAUM
Defendant:
HUMANIGEN, INC., CAMERON DURRANT, TIMOTHY MORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
FLADGER v. KAHUNA et al
as 2:2022cv06089
Plaintiff:
FLADGER T. CHAPPELL and CHAPPELL T. FLADGER
Defendant:
VICTORIA KAHUNA, JUDITH PERSICHILLI, PHIL MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHAPPELL v. GALLAGHER
as 1:2022cv05214
Plaintiff:
Ceal Chappell
Defendant:
Hugh J Gallagher and HUGH J. GALLAGHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
MARTIN v. DEGROAT et al
as 2:2022cv02833
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MARTIN
Defendant:
DANIEL CHAPPELLE-DEGROAT, LANIECE DEGROAT, ROOT INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Aguilar et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00774
Plaintiff:
Keli Aguilar, Gina Armendariz, Mariah Armstrong and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Akers et al. v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00760
Plaintiff:
Delbert Akers, Mark Alcorn, Lori Alexander and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
West Shore Home, LLC et al v. Chappell
as 1:2022cv00204
Plaintiff:
West Shore Home, LLC and West Shore Home Holdings LLC
Defendant:
Craig Chappell
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
