Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Johnson v. Downey et al
as 2:2015cv02045
Plaintiff:
Javon E Johnson
Defendant:
Michael D. Downey, Chad Kolitwenzew, Crystal Krumwiede and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Gill et al
as 2:2015cv02006
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Juarez Perez
Defendant:
Heather Gill, Charee Sangster, Nicole .. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Koliwenzew et al
as 2:2014cv02313
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Brooks
Defendant:
Chad Koliwenzew and Charee Sangster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Townsend v. Kankakee County et al
as 2:2014cv02203
Defendant:
Kankakee County , Michael Downey , Tiniki White and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Townsend
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Louis v. Kankakee County et al
as 1:2014cv01358
Defendant:
Kankakee County, Michael Downey, Tiniki White and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Townsend
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Slay v. Austin et al
as 2:2014cv02004
Plaintiff:
David C Slay
Defendant:
Officer Austin, Charee Sangster, Officer Nolan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry v. Sangster et al
as 2:2013cv02178
Plaintiff:
Frederick Terry
Defendant:
Charee Sangster, Tiniki White, John or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Kolitwenzew et al
as 2:2013cv02179
Plaintiff:
Alton G Smith, Jr
Defendant:
Chad Kolitwenzew, Charee Sangster, Timothy Bukowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newell v. Jerome Combs Detention Center et al
as 2:2013cv02018
Defendant:
Jerome Combs Detention Center, Kankakee County Sheriff's Department, Timothy Bukowski and others
Plaintiff:
Cecil Newell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kennado Taylor v. Charee Sangster, et al
as 13-1065
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNADO K. TAYLOR, also known as KENNADO BOYD TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
CHAREE SANGSTER, Nurse, HEATHER REN, MICHAEL DOWNEY, Chief and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
