Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Davis v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
as 3:2023cv00305
Plaintiff:
Mr. Charles G Davis and Charles G. Davis
Defendant:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
De La Vega et al v. Ali et al
as 1:2013cv06471
Plaintiff:
Leonardo De La Vega , Jose Rojas , Jaime Ruiz and others
Defendant:
Wesam S. Ali, Charles F. Best, Samatha V. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Gericke et al
as 1:2012cv09920
Plaintiff:
Charles B. Davis, Sr.
Defendant:
Ron Gericke and Sal Quality Inspections Solutions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Davis v. Joseph, et al
as 1:2012cv09436
Plaintiff:
Charles B Davis, Sr.
Defendant:
George Joseph and Quality Inspection Solutions
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731 Fraud
Wemple et al v. Illinois State Bar Association et al
as 3:2012cv03254
Plaintiff:
Aaron Wemple, People of Christian County, Illinois, People of Shelby County, Illinois and others
Defendant:
Illinois State Bar Association, John E Thies, Paula H Holderman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wemple et al v. Illinois State Bar Association et al
as 3:2012cv01010
Plaintiff:
Aaron Wemple, People of Christian County, Illinois, People of Shelby County, Illinois and others
Defendant:
Illinois State Bar Association, John E Thies, Paula H Holderman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. BNSF Railway Company
as 3:2011cv00678
Plaintiff:
Charles L. Davis
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Davis v. Retirement Plan of Phibro Animal Health Corporation and Subsidiaries and Affiliates et al
as 3:2008cv00779
Plaintiff:
Charles L. Davis
Defendant:
Retirement Plan of Phibro Animal Health Corporation and Subsidiaries and Affiliates, Phibro Animal Health Corporation, Prince Agri Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
