Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Smith v. USA
as 5:2015cv02044
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Charles K Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wright v. Prator et al
as 5:2014cv00786
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Wright
Defendant:
Steve Prator , Charles M Smith and Jody Levine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray Bros., Inc et al v. Architectural Building Components, Inc., et al
as 2:2012cv01079
Plaintiff:
Ray Bros., Inc and Gino R. Ray
Defendant:
Architectural Building Components, Inc. and Charles L Smith, Jr
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Smith v. US Parole Commission
as 3:2012cv00061
Defendant:
Bryan Bellelo and US Parole Commission
Interested Party:
Catherine Maraist
Plaintiff:
Charles Kelvin Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Goff et al v. CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv04122
Plaintiff:
Alice Goff , Myra A. Hartfield , Leo Hawkins and others
Defendant:
CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc., Bechtel National, Inc, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Smith v. P2S LLC et al
as 2:2010cv01707
Defendant:
P2S LLC, Mississippi Farm Bureau, Continental Casualty Company and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Gordon Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bromberg v. Smith
as 2:2008cv04209
Plaintiff:
Yakov Bromberg
Defendant:
Charles C. Smith
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Northoaks Health Systems et al
as 2:2008cv01337
Plaintiff:
Charles E Smith
Defendant:
Northoaks Health Systems, James Cathney, Cindy Coats and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Beard et al v. Merck & Co Inc
as 2:2007cv09597
Plaintiff:
Mary Beard, Larry Beatty, Yvonne Brooks and others
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc, Merck & Co Inc and Merck & Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
