Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Gordon v. Kellam
as 3:2023cv02088
Plaintiff:
Daryl Jerome Gordon
Defendant:
Rachel Joyce Kellam, Attorney General of Texas Child Support Division, Texas Office of the Attorney General Child Support Division and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Stanard v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
as 1:2019cv01211
Plaintiff:
Charles Andrew Stanard
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Darr v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2017cv01172
Plaintiff:
Charles Andrew Darr
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company v. Andrews et al
as 3:2016cv02083
Defendant:
Mark Phelps Andrews and Charles Andrews
Plaintiff:
Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arroyo v. United States Of America
as 3:2016cv00253
Petitioner:
Charles Andrew Arroyo
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Camarillo v. Sachtleben et al
as 5:2011cv00582
Defendant:
FNU Brazozowski, FNU LaFluer, Adan Munoz, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Andrew Camarillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nolen v. Thaler
as 1:2010cv00668
Petitioner:
Charles Andrew Nolen
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nolen v. Thaler
as 4:2010cv03016
Plaintiff:
Charles Andrew Nolen
Defendant:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Arroyo v. Upton
as 1:2010cv00489
Petitioner:
Charles Andrew Arroyo
Respondent:
Jody R Upton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Arroyo v. United States Of America
as 3:2007cv00365
Petitioner:
Charles Andrew Arroyo, Jr.
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
