Cases 1 - 10 of 17
USA v. Charles Baker, III
as 24-11144
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHARLES BAKER, III
Marie Baptiste et al v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al
as 1:2020cv11335
Plaintiff:
Marie Baptiste, Mitchell Matorin and Jonathan Daponte
Defendant:
Executive Office of Housing and Economic Development, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Gov. Charles Baker and others
Amicus Curiae:
Pacific Legal Foundation, UMass Memorial Health Care, Inc., MLPB (F/K/A Medical Legal Partnership / Boston) and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Chelsea Collaborative, Inc., Springfield No One Leaves, City Life/Vida Urbana and others
Petitioner:
Joseph Michalakes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
USA v. Charles Baker, III
as 20-10305
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES BAKER, III
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Tim Sundy, et al v. Friendship Pavilion, et al
as 19-10445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOVA-LEE GRABER, TIM SUNDY and DAVID SUNDY
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS LING, NOVA CASUALTY COMPANY, JACQUES PARTAIN and others
Other:
SERVICE
Driscoll v. XO Group Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv10909
Defendant:
Michael Steib, Michael Zeisser, Charles Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Samantha Driscoll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv
Scarantino v. XO Group Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01814
Defendant:
Michael Steib, Michael Zeisser, Diane Irvine and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Scarantino
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00606
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Baker v. Jensen et al
as 2:2017cv00141
Plaintiff:
Charles Baker
Defendant:
Darren Jay Jensen, Mark R. Jaggi, Michael A. Beindorff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Malden Transportation, Inc. et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv12538
Plaintiff:
Malden Transportation, Inc. , PEGM Transportation, LLC , Medford Trans., Inc. and others
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. , Governor Charles Baker and Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
