Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 65
DANIEL v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00871
Plaintiff: CHARLES DANIEL
Defendant: ANDREW M SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
COUNCIL v. DANIELS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00470
Petitioner: WILLIAM H. COUNCIL
Respondent: CHARLES DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
VERONICA v. DANIELS
as 2:2017cv00423
Respondent: CHARLES DANIELS
Petitioner: SOLORIO CAJERO VERONICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HALL v. DANIELS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00176
Respondent: CHARLES DANIELS
Petitioner: ORLANDO CORDIA HALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TAYLOR v. DANIELS
as 2:2017cv00057
Respondent: CHARLES DANIELS
Petitioner: ROBERT TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RIGGLEMAN v. DANIELS
as 2:2017cv00027
Respondent: CHARLES DANIELS
Petitioner: ELISHA RIGGLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CHESTNUT v. DANIELS
as 2:2017cv00009
Petitioner: RAYMOND EDWARD CHESTNUT
Respondent: CHARLES DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CHESTNUT v. DANIELS
as 2:2017cv00016
Petitioner: RAYMOND EDWARD CHESTNUT
Respondent: CHARLES DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CHESTNUT v. DANIELS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00014
Petitioner: RAYMOND EDWARD CHESTNUT
Respondent: CHARLES DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CHESTNUT v. DANIELS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00018
Petitioner: RAYMOND EDWARD CHESTNUT
Respondent: CHARLES DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?