Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Brooks v. Samuel et al
as 1:2017cv00351
Plaintiff:
Charles Aaron Brooks
Defendant:
Charles E Samuel, Jr. , Mathew Paimpalil , Briant Ennis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Castro-Alvardo v. Sessions et al
as 5:2017cv00085
Plaintiff:
Juan Castro-Alvardo
Defendant:
Jeff Sessions, U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kattom v. Sessions et al
as 5:2017cv00083
Plaintiff:
Amjad Kattom
Defendant:
Jeff Sessions, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and Dave Berkebile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Morales v. Samuels, et al.
as 5:2017cv00110
Petitioner:
Jesus Hawkins Morales
Respondent:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rodriguez v. Lynch et al
as 5:2017cv00013
Plaintiff:
Justo Pastor Rodriguez Rodriguez
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch, Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Dave Berkebile and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ramos v. Lynch et al
as 5:2016cv00128
Plaintiff:
Eddy Alberto-Deleon Ramos
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch, Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Dave Berkebile and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Alfaro v. Lynch et al
as 5:2016cv00127
Plaintiff:
Luis Antonio Alfaro
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and Dave Berkebile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Alvarado v. Lynch et al
as 5:2016cv00113
Plaintiff:
Elias Alvarado
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and Dave Berkebile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Flores-Lira v. Lynch et al
as 5:2016cv00112
Petitioner:
Juan Antonio Flores-Lira
Respondent:
Loretta Lynch, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and Dave Berkebile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Benitez-Bustos v. Lynch et al
as 5:2016cv00108
Petitioner:
Efrain Benitez-Bustos
Respondent:
Loretta Lynch, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and Dave Berkebile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
