Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Bralen Jordan v. BOP, et al
as 21-3301
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRALEN LAMAR JORDAN
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director, General Counsel and others
Jordan v. United States Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 3:2021cv50423
Plaintiff:
Braden Lamar Jordan and Bralen Lamar Jordan
Defendant:
United States Federal Bureau Of Prisons, United States, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bralen Jordan v. USA, et al
as 21-1171
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRALEN LAMAR JORDAN
Jordan v. United States of America et al
as 3:2020cv50514
Plaintiff:
Bralen Lamar Jordan
Defendant:
Ian Connors, Jeffrey Ray Ormond, Kevin Kerbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bralen Jordan v. C. Rivers, et al
as 20-3372
Defendant / Appellee:
C. RIVERS, SYED F. HYDER, J. E. KRUEGER, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRALEN LAMAR JORDAN
Bralen Jordan v. Kathleen Sawyer, et al
as 20-2954
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVE EBBERTS, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, Director of Operations/Custody, KATHLEEN H. SAWYER, Director and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRALEN LAMAR JORDAN
Jordan v. Rivers et al
as 3:2020cv50297
Defendant:
Syed Fateh Hyder, Dr. Gourdorer, J. E. Krueger and others
Plaintiff:
Bralen Lamar Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Samuels, Jr. et al
as 3:2020cv50211
Plaintiff:
Bralen Lamar Jordan and Shubazz
Defendant:
R. Winters, J. E. Krueger, Ian Connors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Sawyor et al
as 1:2020cv01984
Defendant:
Jeffery Ray Ormond, Ramarize, Cruize and others
Plaintiff:
Bralen Lamar Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Sawyor et al
as 1:2020cv01097
Defendant:
. Ramarize, Jeffery Ray Ormond, Ian Connors and others
Plaintiff:
Bralen Lamar Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
