Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Jordan v. United States Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 3:2021cv50423
Plaintiff:
Braden Lamar Jordan and Bralen Lamar Jordan
Defendant:
United States Federal Bureau Of Prisons, United States, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. United States of America et al
as 3:2020cv50514
Plaintiff:
Bralen Lamar Jordan
Defendant:
Ian Connors, Jeffrey Ray Ormond, Kevin Kerbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jordan v. Rivers et al
as 3:2020cv50297
Defendant:
Syed Fateh Hyder, Dr. Gourdorer, J. E. Krueger and others
Plaintiff:
Bralen Lamar Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Samuels, Jr. et al
as 3:2020cv50211
Plaintiff:
Bralen Lamar Jordan and Shubazz
Defendant:
R. Winters, J. E. Krueger, Ian Connors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Sawyor et al
as 1:2020cv01984
Defendant:
Jeffery Ray Ormond, Ramarize, Cruize and others
Plaintiff:
Bralen Lamar Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Sawyor et al
as 1:2020cv01097
Defendant:
. Ramarize, Jeffery Ray Ormond, Ian Connors and others
Plaintiff:
Bralen Lamar Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fiorito v. Samuels, Jr. et al
as 1:2016cv01064
Plaintiff:
Michael Fiorito
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Bell, Krauski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stanislawczyk et al v. Doe et al
as 1:2015cv08091
Plaintiff:
Marek Stanislawczyk
Defendant:
John Doe , A. Henderson , C. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thelen v. Cross et al
as 3:2014cv00760
Plaintiff:
Patrick Thelen
Defendant:
James Cross, Jr, Charles E Samuels, Jr and Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Younger v. Samuels et al
as 3:2013cv00391
Petitioner:
Louis Younger
Respondent:
Charles E Samuels, Jr, James N Cross and Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
