Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Mitchell v. Lappin et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Defendant:
Kevin Bittenbender, Mark Preoria, David C. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brooks v. Samuel, Jr. et al
as 3:2020cv00927
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuel, Jr., Mr. Rakowski, Warden Quay and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Aaron Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANDERS v. MARLER et al
as 2:2018cv05477
Defendant:
R. SMITH, SPECIAL INVESTIGATIVE SECTION/SERVICES (S.I.S.) DEPT. AND STAFF, WARDEN SEAN MARLER and others
Plaintiff:
ROCMON L. SANDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Samuel et al
as 3:2016cv02386
Petitioner:
Charles Aaron Brooks
Respondent:
Charles E. Samuel, Jr. and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shorter v. Samuels et al
as 3:2016cv01973
Plaintiff:
Janice Shorter
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Joseph L. Norwood, Robert Kaszuba and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
MALLOY v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 3:2016cv00418
Petitioner:
GERALD J. MALLOY
Respondent:
U.S Department of Justice , Federal Bureau of Prisons , Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ORTIZ-CONTRERAS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2015cv01889
Plaintiff:
Lucio Ortiz-Contreras
Defendant:
Eric Himpton Holder, Jr. , Harley Lappin , Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PAULEY et al v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2015cv00158
Plaintiff:
OVERTON WAYNE PAULEY, ZACHARY T. KING, DAVID J. GOWER and others
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. , BOBBY L. MEEKS , HOWARD BARRON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCullon v. Ebbert et al
as 3:2015cv01205
Petitioner:
Michael Tyrone McCullon
Respondent:
David J. Ebbert, David R. Wilson, J.L. Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DAVIS v. SAMUELS
as 3:2014cv00821
Plaintiff:
Willie L Davis
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
