Cases 1 - 7 of 7
DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK et al v. Sams et al
as 2:2024cv01547
Plaintiff:
DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK and MAYA K. VAN ROSSUM
Defendant:
Charles F. Sams, III, NATIONAL PARK SERVICE and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
ALLEY CAT ALLIES INCORPORATED v. UNITED STATES NATIONAL PARK SERVICE et al
as 1:2024cv00876
Plaintiff:
ALLEY CAT ALLIES INCORPORATED
Defendant:
UNITED STATES NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, CHARLES F. SAMS, III, MARK FOUST and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
VAN DER WERF et al v. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE et al
as 1:2024cv00639
Plaintiff:
ESTHER VAN DER WERF, TOBY STOVER and ELIZABETH DASBURG
Defendant:
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and CHARLES F. SAMS, III
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Blueribbon Coalition Inc. v. Garland, et al.
as 4:2023cv00505
Plaintiff:
Blueribbon Coalition Inc
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Debra Haaland, Thomas Vilsack and others
Amicus Curiae:
Center for American Liberty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Bachmann et al v. Golden Gate National Recreational Area et al
as 4:2022cv06250
Plaintiff:
Philippe Bachmann, Megan Bachmann, Jack Bachmann and others
Defendant:
Golden Gate National Recreational Area, Deb Haaland, Frank Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Lunsford et al v. US National Park Service et al
as 2:2022cv00543
Plaintiff:
J. Weston Lunsford and Lake Powell Houseboat Owners Asssociation
Defendant:
US National Park Service, Charles F Sam, III, William Shott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
