Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Kimble v. Lumpkin
as 23-40684
Petitioner / Appellant:
Charles Kimble, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Kimble v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Inmate Trust Fund
as 1:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
Charles Kimble, Jr
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Inmate Trust Fund
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kimble v. Lumpkin
as 22-40151
Petitioner / Appellant:
Charles Kimble, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Kimble v. Cerliano
as 21-40339
Defendant / Appellee:
Maxey Cerliano, Luke Whitehead and Dr. Gary White
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles Kimble, Jr.
Kimble v. Jones et al
as 6:2021cv00122
Defendant:
Alfonso Charles, D'Khary Jones, . Angela Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Kimble, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kimble v. Lumpkin
as 6:2021cv00118
Petitioner:
Charles Kimble, Jr
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kimble v. Lumpkin DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRASFERRED TO THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS - TYLER DIVISION
as 4:2021cv00863
Petitioner:
Charles Kimble, Jr
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Charles Kimble v. Anna Valentine
as 21-5079
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES KIMBLE
Respondent / Appellee:
ANNA VALENTINE, Warden
Hopkins v. Kimble et al
as 6:2020cv01181
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Hopkins
Defendant:
John Doe (2 thru 5), Charles Kimble, Mayor Jose Segaria and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson, et al v. Lange, et al
as 6:2020cv01155
Plaintiff:
Michael Orville Anderson, III and Michael Orville Anderson, II
Defendant:
Sheriff Eddie Lange, Chiefs of Police, Sheriffs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
