Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Gillenwater v. Suko et al
as 2:2018cv00263
Defendant:
Lonny R Suko, Joseph H Harrington, John T Rodgers and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Gillenwater
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Gillenwater, II v. Lonny Suko, et al
as 18-35124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES LEE GILLENWATER II, AKA Charles Lee Gillenwater
Defendant - Appellee:
LONNY R. SUKO, Senior Judge for the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, TIMOTHY JOHN OHMS, Assistant United States Attorney and FRANK CIKUTOVICH, Attorney for the Federal Defenders of Eastern Washington and Idaho
Gillenwater v. Suko et al
as 2:2018cv00057
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Gillenwater
Defendant:
Lonny R Suko, Timmothy Ohms and Frank Cikutovich
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Gillenwater v. Rosser
as 1:2017cv00511
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Gillenwater
Defendant:
Tommy Rosser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Gillenwater, II v. Edward Lodge
as 17-35988
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES LEE GILLENWATER II, AKA Charles Lee Gillenwater
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD J. LODGE, US District Court Judge
Charles Gillenwater, II v. Bastian
as 17-35977
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES LEE GILLENWATER II, AKA Charles Lee Gillenwater
Defendant - Appellee:
BASTIAN, Judge
Gillenwater v. Kenyon
as 1:2017cv00493
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Gillenwater
Defendant:
Stephen W Kenyon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillenwater v. Dennis
as 2:2017cv00484
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Gillenwater
Defendant:
P J Dennis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillenwater v. Bastian
as 2:2017cv00478
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Gillenwater
Defendant:
Bastian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Gillenwater, II v. Candy Dale
as 17-35939
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES LEE GILLENWATER II, AKA Charles Lee Gillenwater
Defendant - Appellee:
CANDY W. DALE, United States Magistrate Judge, U.S. Courts, District of Idaho
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
