Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Gillenwater v. Bastian
as 2:2017cv00478
Plaintiff: Charles Lee Gillenwater
Defendant: Bastian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Gillenwater, II v. Candy Dale
as 17-35939
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES LEE GILLENWATER II, AKA Charles Lee Gillenwater
Defendant - Appellee: CANDY W. DALE, United States Magistrate Judge, U.S. Courts, District of Idaho
Gillenwater v. Lodge
as 1:2017cv00468
Plaintiff: Charles Lee Gillenwater
Defendant: Edward J Lodge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillenwater v. Dale
as 1:2017cv00433
Plaintiff: Charles Lee Gillenwater
Defendant: Candy Dale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Gillenwater, II v. Lonny Suko, et al
as 17-35504
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES LEE GILLENWATER II, AKA Charles Lee Gillenwater
Defendant - Appellee: LONNY R. SUKO, Senior Judge for the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, ROSANNA MALOUF PETERSON, District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, JOHN TYLER RODGERS, Magistrate Judge for the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington and others
Gillenwater v. Suko et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00215
Plaintiff: Charles Lee Gillenwater
Defendant: Lonny R Suko, Rosanna Malouf Peterson, John T Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gillenwater v. Suko et al
as 2:2017cv00242
Plaintiff: Charles Lee Gillenwater
Defendant: Lonny R Suko, Rosanna Malouf Peterson, John T Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gillenwater v. Rodgers We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00183
Plaintiff: Charles Lee Gillenwater
Defendant: John T Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillenwater v. Suko et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00179
Plaintiff: Charles Lee Gillenwater
Defendant: Lonny R Suko and Timothy Ohms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?