Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Antonio Davis v. Fort Lauderdale Police Department, et al
as 23-10034
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO R. DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
FORT LAUDERDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT, MARDIE LEVEY COHEN, CHARLES M. GREENE and others
DAVIS VS. FORT LAUDERDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT (INTERNAL AFFAIRS) et al
as 0:2022cv60769
Plaintiff:
Antonio Ringo Davis
Defendant:
FORT LAUDERDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT (INTERNAL AFFAIRS), Mardie Levey Cohen, Charles M Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GREENE v. THE TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL COMPANY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
as 1:2022cv20199
Plaintiff:
CHARLES M. GREENE
Defendant:
THE TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL COMPANY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jay Goodley v. Charles Greene
as 21-13978
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAY GOODLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES M. GREENE, individually and in his official capacity as a Justice of the Sevententh Judicial Circuit Court of Broward County Florida
Goodley v. Greene
as 0:2021cv61284
Defendant:
Charles M. Greene
Plaintiff:
Jay Goodley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garland v. B.S.O. Mail Crime Lab Deputy et al
as 0:2015cv61781
Plaintiff:
Anthony Demetrius Garland
Defendant:
B.S.O. Mail Crime Lab Deputy, B.S.O. Female Crime Lab Deputy, B.S.O. Deputy Luis Galindez, I.D. #5592 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Garland v. Sapak et al
as 0:2008cv61144
Plaintiff:
Anthony D Garland
Defendant:
Peter Sapak, Inger Daniels and Charles M Greene
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lee et al v. A&W Pritchard Enterprises, Inc., et al.
as 3:2007cv00514
Plaintiff:
Sharetta L. Lee and Charles M. Green
Defendant:
A&W Pritchard Enterprises, Inc., Walter Pritchard, Alfreda Pritchard and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Charles M. Greene v. ACandS, Inc., et al.
as MD/1:02-CV-03914
Defendant:
ACandS, Inc
Plaintiff:
Charles M. Greene
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
