Cases 1 - 10 of 25
HESTAND v. Office of the Inspector General et al
as 6:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
JAMON HESTAND
Defendant:
Office of the Inspector General, Officer Curtis D. Bitz, Officer Candace Stevick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheppard v. Collum
as 21-40920
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Curtis Lee Sheppard, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael A. Collum, Spencer Lucas, Derek Light and others
McDavid v. Thompson
as 21-40175
Defendant / Appellee:
Bobby Jo Barnet, Charles O. Meador, II, Kimberly D. Thompson and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Roy Lynn McDavid
Sheppard v. Collum et al
as 6:2021cv00055
Defendant:
Charles O Meador, II, Spencer Lucas, Derek Light and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Sheppard, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDavid v. Thompson et al
as 6:2020cv00579
Defendant:
Charles O Meador, II, Pennie R Kempt, Kimberly D Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Lynn McDavid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDavid v. Thompson et al
as 3:2020cv03256
Defendant:
Charles O Meador, II, Pennie R Kempt and Kimberly D Thompson
Plaintiff:
Roy Lynn McDavid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Kempt et al
as 6:2020cv00510
Defendant:
Nicole F Santifer, Charles O Meador, Kilven D. Cuba and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Waynne Miller, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Marshall et al
as 6:2020cv00511
Defendant:
Treazure S Lindsey, Daniel R. Jett, Kathy L Claiborne and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Waynne Miller, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Stiefer et al
as 6:2020cv00479
Defendant:
Charles O Meador, II, Kirk Stiefer and Penny Kempt
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis Sheppard, Jr. v. Kirk Etiefer, et al
as 20-40555
Defendant / Appellee:
Assistant Warden Penny Kempt, Senior Warden Kirk Etiefer and Assistant Warden Charles O. Meador, II
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Curtis Lee Sheppard, Jr.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
