Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Guin v. North Carolina Adult Corrections
as 5:2024hc02076
Petitioner:
Charles Robert Guin, Jr.
Respondent:
North Carolina Adult Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barefoot v. USA
as 5:2016hc02163
Petitioner:
Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Barefoot v. USA
as 5:2015cv00596
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Barefoot v. USA
as 5:2012cv00715
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Barefoot v. Revell et al
as 5:2010hc02030
Petitioner:
Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr.
Respondent:
Sarah Revell and United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Barefoot v. Pettit et al
as 5:2009ct03148
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr.
Defendant:
R. Pettit, J. H. Noray, Mark Mansell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Barefoot et al v. Derry et al
as 5:2009ct03143
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr., Christian Gaton and Richard Daniel Honeycutt
Defendant:
Nurse Derry, Dr. Gonzalez, Campos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Barefoot v. Revell et al
as 5:2009hc02091
Petitioner:
Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr.
Respondent:
Sarah Revell and Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Martinez et al v. Harrison et al
as 5:2008ct03169
Plaintiff:
Elvin Adrian Martinez and Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr.
Defendant:
Donnie Harrison, C. Thomas, D. Bell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Barefoot v. Holding et al
as 5:2008hc02179
Petitioner:
Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr.
Respondent:
George E.B. Holding and Eric David Goulian
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
