Cases 1 - 10 of 19
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC v. ARMSTRONG et al
as 3:2023cv01688
Petitioner:
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC
Respondent:
CHRISTOPHER R. ARMSTRONG, CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC. and RANDALL B. KIEFNER
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC. v. KOEPPEL et al
as 2:2022cv02236
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC.
Defendant:
ALEXIA KOEPPEL, H ANDREW SCHWED, MEREDITH KOEPPEL SCHWED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00603
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
v. SMALLEY et al
as 2:2019cv13894
Respondent:
CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC.
Claimant:
MARK BRIAN SMALLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC. v. ARMSTRONG et al
as 3:2019cv09307
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER ARMSTRONG and RANDALL KIEFNER
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KAROON et al v. THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv00034
Plaintiff:
LISA KAROON and MANICKAM GANESH
Defendant:
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. , MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER & SMITH, INC. , CREDIT SUISSE (USA), INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
MINEWEASER v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2016cv01172
Plaintiff:
GREGORY MINEWEASER
Defendant:
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and CHARLES SCHWAB & CO. INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC. v. PICINICH
as 2:2016cv00839
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC.
Defendant:
DANIEL JOSEPH PICINICH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC. v. VALUED ADVISERS TRUST
as 2:2015cv03862
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC.
Defendant:
VALUED ADVISERS TRUST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PIELIN et al
as 2:2015mc00457
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CYNTHIA PIELIN
Garnishee:
CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
