Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Gilbert v. Simmons, et al
as 22-3259
Petitioner / Appellant:
CRAIG I. GILBERT and CRAIG IVAN GILBERT
Respondent / Appellee:
CHARLES SIMMONS, L. E. BRUCE and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF KANSAS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3224
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv03215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Brown (ID 95054) v. Lundry et al
as 5:2019cv03152
Defendant:
Debra Lundry, Jennifer Clements, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
William E. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw (ID 07400) v. Simmons et al
as 5:2015cv03161
Plaintiff:
Dennis E. Shaw, III
Defendant:
Charles Simmons and Dave Riggin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stallings v. Werholtz, et al
as 12-3028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL LAMOUNT STALLINGS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER WERHOLTZ, Secretary, Kansas Department of Corrections, STUART A. BAILEY, COLETTE WINKLEBAUER and others
Harvey v. Rohling et al
as 5:2011cv03137
Plaintiff:
Levi Lloyd Harvey
Defendant:
Karen Rohling, Ray Reno, Paht Willesdan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lynn v. Roberts et al
as 5:2011cv03073
Plaintiff:
Patrick C. Lynn
Defendant:
Ray Roberts, Larry Hoshaw, Susan Gibreal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Lawhorn, et al
as 10-3131
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES D. GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES D. LAWHORN, CCS Regional Medical Director, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, KDOC Medical Provider and JOHN M. SATCHELL, Doctor, CCS Employee
Defendant:
ROGER WERHOLTZ, Secretary of Corrections, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Governor of Kansas, CHARLES SIMMONS, KDOC Deputy Secretary of Corrections and others
:
Stallings v. Werholtz et al
as 5:2010cv03119
Plaintiff:
Darrell Lamont Stallings
Defendant:
Roger Werholtz, Marcelle Cappel-Schmidling, Stuart A. Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
