Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 31 - 38 of 38
SMITH v. AQUA-CHEM, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv67160
Plaintiff: PETER CHARLES SMITH
Defendant: AQUA-CHEM, INC., BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC, INC., CERTAIN TEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
SMITH v. GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv86015
Plaintiff: BILLY CHARLES SMITH and BILLY CHARLES SMITH
Defendant: GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION, GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION and UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None
SMITH v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv86771
Plaintiff: CHARLES SMITH and CHARLES SMITH
Defendant: WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, AB ELECTROLUX, SPIRAX-SARCO, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None
COUSIN et al v. DODRILL et al
as 2:2008cv03126
Plaintiff: MUADHDHIN COUSIN, RAFI SMITH, BRAHEEM JACKSON and others
Defendant: SCOTT DODRILL, TIMOTHY CRAIG, RAY-BROOK and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SMITH v. WESTINHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv79768
Plaintiff: CHARLES SMITH
Defendant: WESTINHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, ABER INSULATION, ABNEY MILLS and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None
SMITH v. A.M. LOCKETT & COMPANY, LTD. et al
as 2:2008cv79006
Plaintiff: CHARLES SMITH, CHARLES SMITH and CHARLES SMITH
Defendant: A.M. LOCKETT & COMPANY, LTD., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None
SMITH v. MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO. et al
as 2:2008cv69944
Plaintiff: CHARLES SMITH
Defendant: MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO., AMERICAN OPITCAL CORPORATION, THE BENDIX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00952
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?