Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Joseph Favors v. Samantha Ensz, et al
as 21-2826
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Anthony Favors
Defendant / Appellee:
Samantha Ensz, Individual/official capacities and Therapist of CPS, Michael Hettig, Individual/official capacities and as Clinical Supervisor of CPS, Nancy Johnston, Individual/official capacities and as Executive Director of MSOP/CPS and others
David Gamble, et al v. Minnesota State-Operated Svcs, et al
as 21-2626
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Leroy Gamble, Cyrus Patrick Gladden, II, and all others similarly situated, David James Jannetta, and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Minnesota State-Operated Services, Minnesota State Industries, Minnesota Sex Offender Program and others
Defendant:
Emily Johnson Piper, Shelby Richardson, John and Jane Does, 1-20 as unknown individuals and others
Raymond Semler v. Nancy Johnston, et al
as 19-3669
Defendant / Appellee:
Charlie Hoffman, Vocational Work Program Director, sued in their individual and official capacities, Nancy Johnston, Executive Director of MSOP, sued in their individual and official capacities, Julie Sajdak, Vocational Programming Supervisor, sued in their individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Raymond Leon Semler
Gutierrez v. Hoffman et al
as 0:2019cv02857
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Gutierrez
Defendant:
Paul Christensen, Charlie Hoffman and Ciara Macklanburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens v. Lourey et al
as 0:2019cv00684
Defendant:
John Doe, Jamie Houk, Donna Cronin and others
Plaintiff:
Brad Ronald Stevens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Semler v. Johnston et al
as 0:2017cv02822
Plaintiff:
Raymond L. Semler
Defendant:
Nancy Johnston, Charlie Hoffman and Peter Puffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lindsey v. Moser et al
as 0:2015cv02091
Plaintiff:
Dale Allen Lindsey
Defendant:
Kevin Moser, Becky Olson, Peter Puffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
