Cases 31 - 40 of 315
Flynn et al v. Verizon Wireless et al
as 3:2022cv01065
Plaintiff:
John J. Flynn, John Doe, John Does and others
Defendant:
Verizon Wireless, Richard Blumenthal, Bob Duff and others
Petitioner:
Stamford Police Dept, Darien Police Dept, Town of Wilton, CT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Deon Duke v. Microsoft Corporation, et al
as 22-2455
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEON LEWIS DUKE, formerly doing business as Serious Tattooing, formerly doing business as Deon LLC, formerly doing business as Option Inc
Defendant / Appellee:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, ALPHABET INC., META PLATFORMS, INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hicks v. Charter Communications, Inc., et al.
as 3:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
David K. Hicks
Defendant:
Charter Communications, Inc. doing business as Spectrum and John Does
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Charter Communications, Inc. v. Bartee
as 5:2022cv01297
Plaintiff:
Charter Communications, Inc. d/b/a Spectrum
Defendant:
Jonte Bartee
Hicks v. Charter Communications, Inc., et al.
as 1:2022cv00426
Plaintiff:
David K. Hicks
Defendant:
Charter Communications, Inc. doing business as Spectrum and John Does
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Desaigoudar v. Charter Communications, Inc.
as 8:2022cv01652
Plaintiff:
Sherri Desaigoudar
Defendant:
Charter Communications, Inc., d/b/a Spectrum
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Duke v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00792
Plaintiff:
Deon Lewis Duke formerly doing business as Serious Tattooing formerly doing business as Deon LLC formerly doing business as Option Inc
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation, Alphabet Corporation, Meta Platforms Inc and others
Cagle v. Charter Communications, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00895
Plaintiff:
Phillip Cagle
Defendant:
Charter Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Scelsi v. Charter Communications, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00479
Plaintiff:
Corey Scelsi
Defendant:
Charter Communications, Inc. d/b/a Spectrum Business Services
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
