Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Robb v. Connecticut Board of Veterinary Medicine et al
as 3:2015cv00906
Plaintiff:
John M. Robb
Defendant:
Connecticut Board of Veterinary Medicine , B. Kenneth Bernhard , Timothy Plunkett and others
Movant:
Charter Practices International, LLC and Medical Management International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Robinson v. Charter Practices International, LLC et al (PLR1)
as 3:2014cv01736
Defendant:
Charter Practices International LLC and Medical Management International, Inc.
Unknown:
Catherine Hope Molloy and Catherine Hope Molloy
Plaintiff:
James W Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Robinson v. Charter Practices International, LLC et al (PLR1)
as 3:2014cv00484
Plaintiff:
James W Robinson
Defendant:
Charter Practices International, LLC and Medical Management International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grove City Veterinary Service, LLC et al v. Charter Practices International, LLC
as 3:2013cv02276
Defendant:
Charter Practices International, LLC
Plaintiff:
Heather M. Fees, DVM, Grove City Veterinary Service, LLC and Heather Fees, DVM, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Charter Practices International, LLC et al v. Robb
as 3:2012cv01768
Plaintiff:
Charter Practices International, LLC and Medical Management International, Inc.
Defendant:
John M. Robb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Charter Practices International, LLC v. Goldberg et al
as 0:2012cv62407
Plaintiff:
Charter Practices International, LLC
Defendant:
Barry A. Goldberg , Mascota at West Flagler, P.A. , Mascota on Federal Highway, P.A. and others
Counter_claimant:
Mascota on Federal Highway, P.A. , Mascota at West Flagler, P.A. , Barry A. Goldberg and others
Counter_defendant:
Charter Practices International, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
