Cases 1 - 10 of 718
Thomas v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2024cv04038
Plaintiff:
Chase Allen Thomas
Defendant:
Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dilworth (PS) et al v. Herrmann et al
as 1:2024cv01145
Plaintiff:
Patricia Lorraine Dilworth, Latonya Denise Davis, Curtis Meeks, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Kayla M Herrmann, Christina S Hillman, Kevin Laylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith v. Dominguez, et al
as 24-8018
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN C. SMITH
Defendant:
LEVI DOMINGUEZ, individually and in his official capacity as Sheridan County Sheriff, TRAVIS KOLTISKA, individually and in his official capacity as Sheridan Police Department Chief of Police, CHRISTOPHER LAROSA, individually and in his official capacity as Sheridan County Prosecutor and others
Villecco v. Spesshardt, et al
as 24-1105
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL VILLECCO
Defendant:
PHILIP E. SPESSHARDT, JOSEPH M. BARELA, CHER R. HAAVIND and others
Barker v. Weatherford Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Derrick Duane Barker
Defendant:
Weatherford Police Department, Ryan Hetherington, Sean Lanier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Villecco v. Spesshardt, et al
as 24-1074
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL VILLECCO
Defendant:
PHILIP E. SPESSHARDT, JOSEPH M. BARELA, CHER R. HAAVIND and others
Smith v. Sheridan County Sheriff et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Defendant:
Sheridan County Sheriff, Sheridan Chief of Police, Sheridan County Prosecutor LaRosa and others
Plaintiff:
Franklin C Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Villecco v. Spesshardt, et al
as 24-1060
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL VILLECCO
Defendant:
PHILIP E. SPESSHARDT, JOSEPH M. BARELA, CHER R. HAAVIND and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
