Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Chase v. Sullivan et al
as 5:2022cv05090
Petitioner:
Nathan Chase
Respondent:
Warden Dan Sullivan and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chase Alone v. United States of America
as 5:2022cv05020
Plaintiff:
Henry Chase Alone
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Chase Alone v. United States of America
as 5:2021cv05017
Respondent:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Henry Chase Alone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Almond v. Butler et al
as 4:2020cv04054
Defendant:
Milo Hartson, Travis Olsen, Brittany Stenzel and others
Plaintiff:
Prentice W. Almond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lundahl et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 5:2017cv05069
Plaintiff:
Logan Lundahl and Holli Lundahl
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, Michele M Christiansen, Mary Corporon and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Kiir v. Vanderhule et al
as 4:2016cv04041
Plaintiff:
Diw Bol Kiir
Defendant:
Chase Vanderhule, Michael Miller and Lyndee Kamrath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kiir v. Vanderhule et al
as 4:2015cv04164
Plaintiff:
Diw Bol Kiir
Defendant:
Chase Vanderhule, Michael Miller and Lyndee Kamrath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kiir v. Vanderhule et al
as 4:2015cv04139
Plaintiff:
Diw Bol Kiir
Defendant:
Chase Vanderhule, Sioux Falls Police Department, State of South Dakota and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyer v. JP Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 5:2015cv05059
Plaintiff:
Rene D. Meyer
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation and Auto-Owners Insurance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053
Chase In Winter v. United States of America
as 5:2011cv05070
Plaintiff:
Dana Chase In Winter
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
