Cases 21 - 30 of 253
Nathan Cooley v. County of Los Angeles Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02078
Plaintiff:
Nathan Cooley
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles Inc., Chase Bank N.A. and Midland Funding LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bar-Lev v. City of San Diego, et al
as 3:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
Naomi Bar-Lev
Defendant:
Does 1-100, City of San Diego, Jonathan Dungan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Pancic v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 3:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
Vanesa Pancic
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Gamal Soloman v. Alex Villanueva, et al
as 22-56106
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GAMAL SOLOMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEX VILLANUEVA, DONALD STEELE, JEFF PRANG and others
Heizelman v. Chase Bank
as 3:2022cv01676
Plaintiff:
Robet Heizelman
Defendant:
Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Lowell Robinson, Jr. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 22-16157
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOWELL ROBINSON, Jr., Master Sergeant USMC, Retired
Defendant / Appellee:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., LEANDRO GUILLEN, Loan Advisor, JOYA LEWIS, Loan Associate and others
Anthony Onibon v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2022cv05088
Plaintiff:
Anthony Onibon
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Jane Doe and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Iden v. Chase Bank
as 3:2022cv00275
Plaintiff:
Richard Iden
Defendant:
Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 wt Removal- Employment (Wrongful Termination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
