Cases 1 - 10 of 181
The Law Offices of Angela Swan, APC v. JP Morgan Chase and Co. et al
as 2:2024cv01114
Plaintiff:
Robert Carr, Angela Swan, Law Offices of Angela Swan and others
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase and Co. doing business as Chase Bank, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07824
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
(PS) Halajian v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA et al
as 2:2023cv01522
Plaintiff:
Barry Stuart Halajian
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA, Elizabeth Ostrowski, Hasset & George, PC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PS) Mouhab v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 2:2023cv01431
Plaintiff:
Ismael Mouhab
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mouhab v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 1:2023cv01055
Plaintiff:
Ismael Mouhab
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Bar-Lev v. City of San Diego, et al
as 3:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
Naomi Bar-Lev
Defendant:
Does 1-100, City of San Diego, Jonathan Dungan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
