Cases 1 - 10 of 10
United States of America v. Funds in the amount of $19,057 in United States currency et al
as 1:2017cv06570
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Funds in the amount of $19,057 in United States currency, Funds in the amount of $3,108 in United States currency, One large diamond cut frame with initial "W," on a 24' chain and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0881
United States of America v. $135,000 United States Currency contained inside Safe Deposit Box #3195 at Chase Bank
as 1:2014cv04864
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Robert Jarta
Defendant:
$135,000 United States Currency contained inside Safe Deposit Box #3195 at Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0881
United States of America v. Funds in the Amount of $246,197.44 Seized From JP Morgan Chase Bank Account XXXXX9895
as 1:2014cv01570
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Funds in the Amount of $246,197.44 Seized From JP Morgan Chase Bank Account XXXXX9895
Claimant:
AU Electronics, Inc. , Adnan Vadria and Yasin Habib
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Funds in the Amount of $91,705
as 1:2013cv08607
Defendant:
Funds in the Amount of $91,705 , FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $95,527.54 CONTAINED IN JP MORGAN CHASE BANK ACCOUNT # XXXXXX5083 HELD IN THE NAME OF FREEHOLD UNLIMITED Corp., FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $15,950.58 CONTAINED IN JP MORGAN CHASE BANK ACCOUNT # XXXXX1917 HELD IN THE NAME OF FREEHOLD UNLIMITED Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $73,870.64, et al.
as 1:2013cv00417
Defendant:
FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $163,841.90 FROM NATIONAL BANK OF INDIANAPOLIS ACCOUNT ENDING IN 8172, IN THE NAME OF ABA #074006674, FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,000.00 HELD IN NATIONAL BANK OF INDIANAPOLIS ACCOUNT ENDING IN 8172, IN THE NAME OF ABA #074006674, FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $73,870.64 FROM CHASE BANK ACCOUNT ENDING IN 8434, IN THE NAME OF JAMES C. MCKINLEY, ATTORNEY AT LAW, IOLTA TRUST ACCOUNT and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781 Forfeiture
United States of America v. Funds in the amount of $112,412.70 seized from Merrill LynchAccount No. XXXX4327 et al
as 1:2012cv10123
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Funds in the amount of $112,412.70 seized from Merrill LynchAccount No. XXXX4327, Funds in the amount of $20,000 seized from Bank of America Deposit Box No. 401, Funds in the amount of $18,683.22 seized from Bank ofAmerica Account No. XXXX8817 and others
Claimant:
Dimitar Vangelov
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Funds in the Amount of $39,373.00 Seized From Safety Deposit Box No. 214-001203-1 at Lasalle Bankd, et al
as 1:2011cv07621
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Funds in the Amount of $39,373.00 Seized From Safety Deposit Box No. 214-001203-1 at La Salle Bank, Funds in the Mount of $535.54 Seized From Calumet Bank of Hammond, Account No. XXXXX6964 and Funds in the Amount of Amount of $13,746.20 Seized From JP Morgan Chase Bank Account No. xxxxxxxxxxxx2908
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FUNDS FROM JP MORGAN CHASE BANK ACCOUNT NUMBER 8582717450108
as 4:2011cv00004
Claimant:
ROSA CAMPOS
Defendant:
FUNDS FROM JP MORGAN CHASE BANK ACCOUNT NUMBER 8582717450108
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. $40,000 held in JPMorgan Chase Bank Account Number XXX-XXX-6129
as 1:2007cv06982
Plaintiff:
United States of America and United States of America
Defendant:
$40,000 held in JPMorgan Chase Bank Account Number XXX-XXX-6129
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
