Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Kyrt Wentzell, et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank Natl Assn
as 15-60179
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KYRT M. WENTZELL and RHONDA E. WENTZELL
Defendant - Appellee:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, successor by merger to Chase Home Finance, LLC, successor by merger to Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation
FERNANDEZ et al v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AN ACQUIRER OF CERTAIN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES OF WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK FROM THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION ACTING AS RECEIVER et al
as 8:2014cv00954
Movant:
ALAW
Defendant:
Albertelli Law Partners California, P.A., CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC, successor by merger to CHASE MANHATTAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, erroneously sued as CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC, successor by merger to CHASE MANHATTAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, c/o NDEX W, Chase Bank NA and others
Consol Plaintiff:
Rene DAUGHETEE
Petitioner:
MARTHA C FERNANDEZ
Marcellus Mason, Jr. v. Chase Home Finance, LLC
as 10-14383
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCELLUS M. MASON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC, successor by merger to Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation
Kaplan v. Chase Home Finance LLC, successor by merger with Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation
as 3:2010cv00451
Defendant:
Chase Home Finance LLC, successor by merger with Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation
Plaintiff:
Laurence Kaplan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hector Arredondo et al v. Fremont Investment & Loan et al
as 5:2009cv00747
Plaintiff:
Hector Arredondo and Patricia Arredondo
Defendant:
Fremont Investment & Loan, Chase Home Finance LLC, Chase Home Finance LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Scott v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2008cv00372
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Chase Home Finance LLC, successor by merger to Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation
Plaintiff:
Rosemary B. Scott
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
