Cases 1 - 10 of 310
Daniel Kauwe v. Nicole Caceres et al
as 8:2024cv00855
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kauwe
Defendant:
Nicole Caceres, Stacey Berardino, Clayton Chau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Naturalization Ceremony 04/23/2024
as 3:2024mc80088
Not Yet Classified:
Adriana Denisse Aguirre, Ali Marzoughi, Jonathan Galvez and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02951
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jack Chau et al v. Rosario Galindo et al
as 2:2023cv09724
Plaintiff:
Jack Chau and Shung Lui
Defendant:
Rosario Galindo, Jaime Guijarro, Aldo Rivers and others
(PC) Perkins v. California Correctional Health Care Services et al
as 1:2023cv01607
Plaintiff:
Gary Ronnell Perkins
Defendant:
California Correctional Health Care Services, Judith Holmes, Wei Gu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. American Medical Response Ambulance et al
as 3:2023cv05402
Plaintiff:
Anjali Ward
Defendant:
American Medical Response Ambulance, Jessica Bruce, Officer Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jack Chau et al v. Rosario Galindo et al
as 2:2023cv08842
Plaintiff:
Jack Chau and Shung Lui
Defendant:
Rosario Galindo, Jaime Guijarro, Edwin Olivares and others
Interested Party:
Charley Moon
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Matthew E. Orso v. Todd Disner et al
as 2:2023cv06552
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. Orso
Petitioner:
Nationwide Judgment Recovery Inc
Defendant:
Todd Disner, Trudy Gilmond, Trudy Gilmond, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
