Cases 41 - 50 of 211
Loma v. City and County of Denver et al
as 1:2021cv00047
Defendant:
Firman (I), Kristin (I) Bronson, City and County of Denver and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Loma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03792
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Chavez v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
as 1:2021cv00194
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Plaintiff:
Thomas R Chavez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101
Chavez v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv03798
Defendant:
Limon Medical Staff, CSP Medical Staff, Colorado Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Adrian Chavez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chavez v. Trinidad Colorado Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv03812
Defendant:
Trinidad Colorado Dept. of Corrections, Denver Sheriff Department and Hartley
Plaintiff:
Justin R. Chavez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkins v. Palomino et al
as 1:2020cv03495
Defendant:
Virginia Freed, Jerry Roark, Dean (I) Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Darus Wilkins
Interested Party:
CASE MANAGER FOR Darus Wilkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pulido-Juarez v. Chavez et al
as 1:2020cv03326
Defendant:
Mianna Defusco, Eugene Chavez, Lee Karr and others
Plaintiff:
Yesenia Juarez and Yesenia Pulido-Juarez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loma et al v. City and County of Denver et al
as 1:2020cv02827
Defendant:
Michael (I) Felsoci, Adolph Chavez, Jr., Michael (I) L. Daniels and others
Plaintiff:
Mikel Whitney and Brian Loma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. Cruz et al
as 1:2020cv03189
Plaintiff:
William Montgomery
Defendant:
Randy Chavez and Armando Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chavez v. No Named Defendent
as 1:2020cv02798
Plaintiff:
Luis C Chavez
Defendant:
No Named Defendent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
