Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Abraham Sandor Szomor v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2025cv04718
Plaintiff:
Abraham Sandor Szomor
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, NZBZDIY, guangzhouyuejianyunshangmaoshanghanggerendu and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Caglayan Kaya Goksoy v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv08061
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, yangyang wall art, yu yi art poster and others
Plaintiff:
Caglayan Kaya Goksoy
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Robert Farkas v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv03486
Plaintiff:
Robert Farkas
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, sunmo, xintuowangluo and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Chende LLC et al v. Impressions Vanity Co.
as 8:2018cv01862
Plaintiff:
Guangzhou Tuodian Trade Co., Ltd. and Chende LLC
Defendant:
Impressions Vanity Co.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Chendes et al v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv05715
Plaintiff:
Alana Chendes and Michael Chendes
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc. and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chendes et al v. Xerox HR Solutions, LLC
as 2:2016cv13980
Plaintiff:
Patrick Chendes , Jillian Smith and Dion Tumminello
Defendant:
Xerox HR Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adknowledge Inc v. Jesse Warshal et al
as 5:2013cv01634
Plaintiff:
Adknowledge Inc
Defendant:
Belinda Aurthur, John Brennan, Shelly B Carper and others
Adknowledge Inc v. Jesse Warshal et al
as 5:2013cv01301
Plaintiff:
Adknowledge Inc
Defendant:
Belinda Aurthur, John Brennan, Shelly B Carper and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
