Cases 1 - 10 of 408
Steven Completo et al v. Richman Property Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv04233
Plaintiff:
Steven Completo, Adriana Guillen, Guozhi Cheng and others
Defendant:
Richman Property Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Roderick Washington et al v. Fern et al
as 2:2024cv03723
Plaintiff:
Roderick Washington
Defendant:
Shen Jay Fern, Jackie Lacey, Jose I. Sandoval and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilberto Landeros et al v. Poh Ton Cheng et al
as 8:2024cv00919
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Landeros and Dinah Regner
Defendant:
Poh Ton Cheng, JYH Chang Cheng, Cheng Family Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Klobus v. Akero Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02534
Plaintiff:
Dora Klobus
Defendant:
Akero Therapeutics, Inc., Andrew Cheng, William White and others
Saetern v. Airgas USA, LLC
as 2:2024cv00815
Plaintiff:
Cheng Saetern
Defendant:
Airgas USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Andrew Flemmings v. Yash Patel et al
as 8:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Andrew Flemmings
Defendant:
Yash Patel, David Barr, Andrew Bremer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Saetern v. Airgas USA, LLC
as 2:2024at00317
Plaintiff:
Cheng Saetern
Defendant:
Airgas USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Andrew Flemmings v. Yash Patel et al
as 2:2024cv01243
Plaintiff:
Andrew Flemmings
Defendant:
Yash Patel, David Barr, Andrew Bremer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
