Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Ra-Amari et al v. RE/MAX, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv03171
Plaintiff:
James Ra-Amari, Misty Ra-Amari and Rosemary Afful
Defendant:
RE/MAX, LLC, EXP Realty, LLC, UMRE Investment Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. LIN
as 2:2017cv00875
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
YU-CHENG LIN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Lin v. Lynch
as 16-3677
Petitioner:
Cheng Lin
Respondent:
Loretta E. Lynch, United States Attorney General
Lin v. Holder
as 14-3427
Petitioner:
Ben Chen Lin, AKA Ben Cheng Lin
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
United States of America v. Bazzi (Xiao Cheng Lin)
as 13-3622
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Malik Bazzi, Wang He Bin, AKA Julie Wang, AKA He Bin Huang Wang, Huang Yue Feng, AKA Charlie and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Xiao Cheng Lin
United States of America v. Bazzi (Ling Zhen Hu)
as 13-3481
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Malik Bazzi, Wang He Bin, AKA Julie Wang, AKA He Bin Huang Wang, Xiao Cheng Lin and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Ling Zhen Hu
United States of America v. Bazzi (Xiao Cheng Lin)
as 13-3530
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Malik Bazzi, Wang He Bin, AKA Julie Wang, AKA He Bin Huang Wang, Huang Yue Feng, AKA Charlie and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Xiao Cheng Lin
Xiu Ni, et al v. Attorney General United State
as 12-2862
Petitioner:
XIU ZHEN NI and JIAN CHENG LIN
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Bazzi et al
as 11-4876
Plaintiff - Appellant:
United States of America
Defendant:
Malik Bazzi, Wang He Bin, AKA Julie Wang, AKA He Bin Huang Wang, Huang Yue Feng, AKA Charlie and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Ling Zhen Hu and Xiao Cheng Lin
Lin v. Holder
as 11-4101
Petitioner:
Qi Cheng Lin
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
