Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. et al v. Meraki Integrated Circuit(SHENZHEN) Technology, LTD.
as 4:2022cv01986
Plaintiff:
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. and Chengdu Monolithic Power Systems Co., Ltd.
Counter Claimant:
Meraki Intregrated Circuit (SHENZHEN) Technology, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Monolithic Power Systems Inc et al v. Baseus Accessories LLC
as 2:2021cv05756
Plaintiff:
MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC.,, CHENGDU MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS CO., LTD, Monolithic Power Systems Inc and others
Defendant:
BASEUS ACCESSORIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. et al v. Xiaomi USA LLC et al
as 3:2021cv01963
Plaintiff:
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc., Chengdu Monolithic Power Systems Co., LTD and Chengdu Monolithic Power Systems Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
Xiaomi USA LLC and Xiaomi Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 pt
Meraki Integrated Circuit (Shenzhen) TechnologyIn re: Meraki Integrated Circuit (Shenzhen) Technology
as 21-180
Petitioner:
In re: MERAKI INTEGRATED CIRCUIT (SHENZHEN) TECHNOLOGY, LTD., a Chinese Corporation
Respondent:
MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware Corporation and CHENGDU MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS CO., LTD., a Chinese Corporation
FILING ERROR
as 6:2020cv00873
Plaintiff:
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. and Chengdu Monolithic Power Systems Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. et al v. Promate Electronic Co., LTD., et al
as 6:2020cv00876
Defendant:
MERAKI INTEGRATED CIRCUIT (SHENZHEN) TECHNOLOGY, LTD., a Chinese corporation, CHENGDU MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS CO., LTD., a Chinese Corporation, PROMATE ELECTRONIC CO., LTD., a Taiwanese corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. and Chengdu Monolithic Power Systems Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
