Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Cheri LaBlanche v. Spring Indep School Dist, et al
as 17-20698
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHERI LABLANCHE
Defendant - Appellee:
SPRING INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, YORK RISK SERVICES, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION and others
LaBlanche v. Spring ISD et al
as 4:2016cv03103
Plaintiff:
Cheri LaBlanche
Defendant:
Spring ISD, York Risk Services and Texas TDI/DWC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1348
LaBlanche v. Spring ISD et al
as 4:2016mc02377
Plaintiff:
Cheri LaBlanche
Defendant:
Spring ISD, York Risk Services and Texas TDI/DWC
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
LaBlanche v. National Borad of Medical Examiners et al
as 4:2013cv00204
Plaintiff:
Cheri LaBlanche
Defendant:
National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME), Federation of State Medical Boards and Education Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Cheri LaBlanche v. Natl Bd of Med Examiners, et al
as 12-20590
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHERI LABLANCHE
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS, (NBME), FEDERATION OF STATE MEDICAL BOARDS, (FSMB) and EDUCATIONAL COMMISSION FOR FOREIGN MEDICAL GRADUATES, (ECFMG)
LaBlanche v. National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) et al
as 4:2012mc00485
Plaintiff:
Cheri LaBlanche
Defendant:
National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME), Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) and Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG)
LaBlanche v. Texas Workforce Commission et al
as 4:2007cv01648
Plaintiff:
Cheri LaBlanche
Defendant:
Texas Workforce Commission and Fortbend ISD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
LaBlanche v. Texas Workforce Commission et al. DO NOT DOCKET IN MC 07-282. ENTRIES SHOULD BE MADE IN THE RELATED CIVIL CASE.
as 4:2007mc00282
Plaintiff:
Cheri LaBlanche
Defendant:
Texas Workforce Commission and Fortbend ISD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
