Cases 31 - 40 of 82
Stroman v. Strange et al
as 4:2022cv05159
Plaintiff:
Elijah M Stroman
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange and Donald Holbrok
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Headrick v. Haynes
as 3:2022cv05895
Petitioner:
John Griffin Headrick
Respondent:
Cheryl Strange and Ron Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Strange et al
as 3:2022cv05867
Plaintiff:
Kenneth S Williams
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange and Jose Corrales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scollard v. Stafford Creek Corrections Center et al
as 3:2022cv05851
Plaintiff:
Devon J Scollard
Defendant:
Stafford Creek Corrections Center, Cheryl Strange, Barry DeHaven and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Headrick v. Strange
as 2:2022cv00226
Petitioner:
John Griffin Headrick
Respondent:
Cheryl Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. Strange et al
as 4:2022cv05125
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, H.L. Griffith, Robert M Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Strange et al
as 2:2022cv01400
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, H.L. Griffith, Robert M Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Townsel v. Bowman et al
as 4:2022cv05122
Plaintiff:
Jerry U Townsel
Defendant:
Cheryle Strange, Christopher C Bowman, Christopher M Malone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Neau et al
as 4:2022cv05120
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Brooks Hawkins
Defendant:
Jonathan Neau, Timothy J Taylor, Kenneth G Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thibodeaux v. Daniel et al
as 3:2022cv05708
Plaintiff:
Louis James Thibodeaux
Defendant:
Paul H Daniel, James Key, A Ureno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
