Cases 1 - 10 of 118
Dial v. Dichter et al
as 1:2024cv02648
Plaintiff:
Keith Dial
Defendant:
Kenneth Dichter, Todd Smith, David Adelman and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Google LLC v. Sun et al
as 1:2024cv02559
Defendant:
Yunfeng Sun, Hongnam Cheung, Alphonse Sun and others
Plaintiff:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Broussard v. United Nations et al
as 1:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Brooke Marie Broussard Diplomat doing business as Infinite Light, LLC
Defendant:
United Nations, Mr. Stephen Mathias, Cheung Kong Hutchinson Holdings and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lang v. Dichter et al
as 1:2023cv08316
Plaintiff:
Jesse A. Lang
Defendant:
Kenneth Dichter, Todd Smith, George Mattson and others
Cheung v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08899
Plaintiff:
Chi How Cheung
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Uber USA, LLC and Rasier-NY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Cheung De Wong v. Laurine Lu Cheng, Altice USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08666
Plaintiff:
YUET NGOR CHEUNG DE WONG
Defendant:
LAURINE LU CHENG, ALTICE USA, INC., THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Laurine Lu Cheng and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 fa Removal - E.R.I.S.A. Employee Benefits
Irminger v. Dichter et al
as 1:2023cv06777
Plaintiff:
Philip Irminger
Defendant:
Kenneth Dichter, Todd Smith, David Adelman and others
Chan et al v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation et al
as 5:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Chiao Chan and Wing F. Cheung
Defendant:
Kimberly-Clark Corporation and BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
