Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Byron Chapman v. Chevron Stations, Inc., et al
as 11-17519
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BYRON CHAPMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHEVRON STATIONS, INC., DBA Chevron Station # 1553 and CHEVRON U.S.A., INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00501
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv24375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0621
Williams v. Chevron Stations, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00307
Plaintiff:
John Williams
Defendant:
Chevron Stations, Inc. , John Does 1-10, Jane Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Nasser Noorhani et al v. Chevron Inc et al
as 8:2009cv01215
Plaintiff:
Nasser Noorhani, Nasser Noorhani, Tina Mohammed and others
Defendant:
Chevron Inc, Chevron Inc, Chevron Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Chapman v. Chevron Stations, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv01324
Plaintiff:
Byron Chapman
Defendant:
Chevron Stations, Inc. and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Momplasir v. Chevron Stations, Inc.
as 1:2007cv23225
Plaintiff:
Marie C. Momplasir
Defendant:
Chevron Stations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tremblay v. Chevron Stations, Inc.
as 3:2007cv06009
Plaintiff:
Catherine Tremblay and Catherine Tremblay
Defendant:
Chevron Stations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
