Cases 51 - 60 of 281
Tech Data Corporation et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv05765
Special Master:
Martin Quinn
Defendant:
CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Tech Data Product Management, Inc. and Tech Data Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
The AASI Creditor Liquidating Trust v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv23939
Plaintiff:
The AASI Creditor Liquidating Trust
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Compucom Systems Inc v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2011xc02948
Defendant:
NEC Lcd Technologies Ltd, NEC Corporation of America, Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd and others
Plaintiff:
CompuCom Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Compucom Systems Inc v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv02948
Plaintiff:
Compucom Systems Inc
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Tech Data Corporation et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 8:2011cv02454
Plaintiff:
Tech Data Corporation and Tech Data Product Management, Inc.
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv04119
Plaintiff:
ABC Appliance, Inc., P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation and Marta Cooperative of America, Inc.
Special Master:
Martin Quinn
Defendant:
NEC Corporation of America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, CMO Japan CO., LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Schultze Agency Services, LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv03856
Special Master:
Martin Quinn
Defendant:
NEC Corporation of America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, CMO Japan CO., LTD and others
Plaintiff:
Schultze Agency Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Washington State, et al v. Chimei Innolux Corp., et al
as 11-16862
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WASHINGTON STATE, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General of the State of California, as parens patriae on behalf of natural persons residing in the state, THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CHIMEI INNOLUX CORP., CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA, INC., CMO JAPAN CO., LTD. and others
Interbond Corporation of America v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv03763
Special Master:
Martin Quinn
Defendant:
CMO Japan Co., Ltd., NEC Corporation of America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Interbond Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Schultze Agency Services, LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv03168
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, CMO Japan CO., LTD and others
Plaintiff:
Schultze Agency Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
