Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Collins v. Schusterman, et al
as 16-5136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARYGOLD COLLINS
Defendant - Appellee:
LYNN SCHUSTERMAN, WOMEN'S INTERNATIONAL ZIONIST ORGANIZATION, SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGE - USA INC. and others
Anderson v. Queens Family Court et al
as 1:2016cv01973
Plaintiff:
Shalicia Anderson
Defendant:
Queens Family Court, 46 Precinct and Childrens Village Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Crawford v. Stephenson et al
as 2:2016cv10218
Plaintiff:
Anitra Elaine Crawford
Defendant:
Randall Stephenson, AT&T, Southfield OCC Library and others
Mortimer et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv07186
Plaintiff:
Kim Mortimer and Christian Seifert
Defendant:
City of New York, New York City Administration for Childrens Services, Timothy Duda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Commissioner of Social Services et al
as 1:2015cv00107
Plaintiff:
Vernice Hill
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Services, The Children Village, Danielle Gaffney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Spears v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 202 et al
as 1:2012cv00557
Defendant:
Childrens Village Inc., International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 202 and Anthony Rosa
Plaintiff:
David Spears
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Beasley v. SOS Children's Villages
as 0:2011cv60434
Plaintiff:
Freddie Beasley
Defendant:
SOS Children's Villages
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv09770
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kendricks v. Moore et al
as 2:2008cv15193
Plaintiff:
Christine Kendricks
Defendant:
Eugene Arthur Moore, Michigan Family Independence Agency, Jacinda Kent Jones and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
